cognitive operations in problem solving

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Published: 04 February 2019

Intelligent problem-solvers externalize cognitive operations

• Bruno R. Bocanegra   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0158-2340 1 , 2 ,
• Fenna H. Poletiek 2 , 3 ,
• Bouchra Ftitache 4 &
• Andy Clark 5  

Nature Human Behaviour volume  3 ,  pages 136–142 ( 2019 ) Cite this article

1734 Accesses

15 Citations

221 Altmetric

Metrics details

• Human behaviour
• Intelligence

Humans are nature’s most intelligent and prolific users of external props and aids (such as written texts, slide-rules and software packages). Here we introduce a method for investigating how people make active use of their task environment during problem-solving and apply this approach to the non-verbal Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices test for fluid intelligence. We designed a click-and-drag version of the Raven test in which participants could create different external spatial configurations while solving the puzzles. In our first study, we observed that the click-and-drag test was better than the conventional static test at predicting academic achievement of university students. This pattern of results was partially replicated in a novel sample. Importantly, environment-altering actions were clustered in between periods of apparent inactivity, suggesting that problem-solvers were delicately balancing the execution of internal and external cognitive operations. We observed a systematic relationship between this critical phasic temporal signature and improved test performance. Our approach is widely applicable and offers an opportunity to quantitatively assess a powerful, although understudied, feature of human intelligence: our ability to use external objects, props and aids to solve complex problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Extended plant cognition: a critical consideration of the concept

• André Geremia Parise
•  &  Michael Marder

Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology Open Access 26 July 2023

Catch that word: interactivity, serendipity and verbal fluency in a word production task

•  &  Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau

Psychological Research Open Access 09 January 2020

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

24,99 € / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles

111,21 € per year

only 9,27 € per issue

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Code availability

The routines/code that were used to perform the statistical analyses in this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. For the routine/code that was used for simulating the dual-mode and single-mode problem-solvers see Supplementary Code .

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Jensen A. R. The G Factor: The Science of Mental Ability. (Praeger, Westport, CT, USA, 1998).

Deary, I. J., Strand, S., Smith, P. & Fernandes, C. Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence 35 , 13–21 (2007).

Article   Google Scholar  

Kyllonen, P. C. & Christal, R. E. Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?! Intelligence 14 , 389–433 (1990).

Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E. & Conway, A. R. Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 128 , 309–331 (1999).

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Duncan, J. et al. A neural basis for general intelligence. Science 289 , 457–460 (2000).

Conway, A. R., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D. J. & Minkoff, S. R. A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence 30 , 163–183 (2002).

Engle, R. W. Working memory as executive attention. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 11 , 19–23 (2002).

Kyllonen, P. C. In The General Factor of Intelligence: How General Is It? (eds. Sternberg, R. J. & Gigorenko, E. L.) 415–445 (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2002).

Baddeley, A. Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4 , 829–839 (2003).

Colom, R., Flores-Mendoza, C. & Rebollo, I. Working memory and intelligence. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 34 , 33–39 (2003).

Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J. & Engle, R. W. Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7 , 547–552 (2003).

Gray, J. R., Chabris, C. F. & Braver, T. S. Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence. Nat. Neurosci. 6 , 316–322 (2003).

Olesen, P. J., Westerberg, H. & Klingberg, T. Increased prefrontal and parietal activity after training of working memory. Nat. Neurosci. 7 , 75–79 (2004).

Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z. & Conway, A. R. A. Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs. Psychol. Bull. 131 , 66–71 (2005).

Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J. & Perrig, W. J. Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105 , 6829–6833 (2008).

Hutchins, E. Cognition in the Wild . (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1995).

Google Scholar  

Clark, A. & Chalmers, D. The extended mind. Analysis 58 , 7–19 (1998).

Clark, A. An embodied cognitive science? Trends Cogn. Sci. 3 , 345–351 (1999).

Giere, R. in The Cognitive Bases of Science (ed.s Carruthers, P., Stitch, S. & Siegal, M.) 285–299 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2002).

Clark, A. Supersizing the Mind: Action, Embodiment, and Cognitive Extension . (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2008).

Rowlands, M. The New Science of the Mind: From Extended Mind to Embodied Phenomenology. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2010).

Bocanegra, B. R. Troubling anomalies and exciting conjectures: a bipolar model of scientific discovery. Emot. Rev. 9 , 155–162 (2017).

Lee, K., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. In Perceptual and Cognitive Development (eds. Gelman R. et al.) 185–211 (Academic Press, New York, 1996).

Mithen, S. In Evolution and the Human Mind (eds. Carruthers, P. & Chamberlain, A.) 207–217 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2002).

Clark, A. Natural-born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies and the Future of Human Intelligence . (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK, 2003).

Risko, E. F. & Gilbert, S. J. Cognitive offloading. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20 , 676–688 (2016).

Risko, E. F. & Dunn, T. L. Storing information in-the-world: metacognition and cognitive offloading in a short-term memory task. Conscious. Cogn. 36 , 61–74 (2015).

Gilbert, S. J. Strategic offloading of delayed intentions into the external environment. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 68 , 971–992 (2015).

Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Euden, G. & Hearn, V. Einstellung defused: interactivity and mental set. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 64 , 1889–1895 (2011).

Vallée-Tourangeau, F., Steffensen, S. V., Vallée-Tourangeau, G. & Sirota, M. Insight with hands and things. Acta Psychol. 170 , 195–205 (2016).

Weller, A., Villejoubert, G. & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. Interactive insight problem solving. Think. Reasoning 17 , 424–439 (2011).

Kirsh, D. & Maglio, P. On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Sci. 18 , 513–549 (1994).

Kirsh, D. Thinking with external representations. AI Soc. 25 , 441–454 (2010).

Duncan, J., Chylinski, D., Mitchell, D. J. & Bhandari, A. Complexity and compositionality in fluid intelligence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114 , 5295–5299 (2017).

Kaplan, R. & Saccuzzo, D. Psychological Testing: Principles, Applications, and Issues. 8th edn. (Cengage, Boston, 2012).

Barabasi, A. L. The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics. Nature 435 , 207–211 (2005).

Tomasello, M. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009).

Goodale, M. Thinking outside the box. Nature 457 , 539–539 (2009).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors received no specific funding for this work. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Psychology, Educational, and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Bruno R. Bocanegra

Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands

Bruno R. Bocanegra & Fenna H. Poletiek

Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

Fenna H. Poletiek

Institute for Mental Health Care GGZ Rivierduinen, Leiden, the Netherlands

Bouchra Ftitache

School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

B.R.B., F.H.P. and B.F. designed the experiments. B.R.B. carried out the experiments, simulations and statistical analyses. B.R.B., F.H.P., B.F. and A.C. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno R. Bocanegra .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information.

Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Results, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, Supplementary Note, Supplementary Figs 1–10, and Supplementary References

Reporting Summary

An explanation of how the Supplementary Code can be run.

Supplementary Code

An excel file that allows simulations of the data, noted in the SI and described in the SI Guide.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Bocanegra, B.R., Poletiek, F.H., Ftitache, B. et al. Intelligent problem-solvers externalize cognitive operations. Nat Hum Behav 3 , 136–142 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0509-y

Download citation

Received : 28 November 2017

Accepted : 05 December 2018

Published : 04 February 2019

Issue Date : February 2019

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0509-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

• Michael Marder

Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology (2023)

How can embodied cognition naturalize bounded rationality?

• Enrico Petracca
• James Grayot

Synthese (2023)

• Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau

Psychological Research (2021)

Reliability and Individual Specificity of EEG Microstate Characteristics

• Jia-Hong Gao

Brain Topography (2020)

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

• Social Anxiety Disorder
• Bipolar Disorder
• Kids Mental Health
• Therapy Center
• When To See a Therapist
• Types of Therapy
• Best Online Therapy
• Best Couples Therapy
• Best Family Therapy
• Managing Stress
• Sleep and Dreaming
• Understanding Emotions
• Self-Improvement
• Healthy Relationships
• Relationships in 2023
• Student Resources
• Personality Types
• Verywell Mind Insights
• 2023 Verywell Mind 25
• Mental Health in the Classroom
• Editorial Process
• Meet Our Review Board
• Crisis Support

Problem-Solving Strategies and Obstacles

Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

Sean is a fact-checker and researcher with experience in sociology, field research, and data analytics.

JGI / Jamie Grill / Getty Images

• Application
• Improvement

From deciding what to eat for dinner to considering whether it's the right time to buy a house, problem-solving is a large part of our daily lives. Learn some of the problem-solving strategies that exist and how to use them in real life, along with ways to overcome obstacles that are making it harder to resolve the issues you face.

What Is Problem-Solving?

In cognitive psychology , the term 'problem-solving' refers to the mental process that people go through to discover, analyze, and solve problems.

A problem exists when there is a goal that we want to achieve but the process by which we will achieve it is not obvious to us. Put another way, there is something that we want to occur in our life, yet we are not immediately certain how to make it happen.

Maybe you want a better relationship with your spouse or another family member but you're not sure how to improve it. Or you want to start a business but are unsure what steps to take. Problem-solving helps you figure out how to achieve these desires.

The problem-solving process involves:

• Discovery of the problem
• Deciding to tackle the issue
• Seeking to understand the problem more fully
• Researching available options or solutions
• Taking action to resolve the issue

Before problem-solving can occur, it is important to first understand the exact nature of the problem itself. If your understanding of the issue is faulty, your attempts to resolve it will also be incorrect or flawed.

Problem-Solving Mental Processes

Several mental processes are at work during problem-solving. Among them are:

• Perceptually recognizing the problem
• Representing the problem in memory
• Considering relevant information that applies to the problem
• Identifying different aspects of the problem
• Labeling and describing the problem

Problem-Solving Strategies

There are many ways to go about solving a problem. Some of these strategies might be used on their own, or you may decide to employ multiple approaches when working to figure out and fix a problem.

An algorithm is a step-by-step procedure that, by following certain "rules" produces a solution. Algorithms are commonly used in mathematics to solve division or multiplication problems. But they can be used in other fields as well.

In psychology, algorithms can be used to help identify individuals with a greater risk of mental health issues. For instance, research suggests that certain algorithms might help us recognize children with an elevated risk of suicide or self-harm.

One benefit of algorithms is that they guarantee an accurate answer. However, they aren't always the best approach to problem-solving, in part because detecting patterns can be incredibly time-consuming.

There are also concerns when machine learning is involved—also known as artificial intelligence (AI)—such as whether they can accurately predict human behaviors.

Heuristics are shortcut strategies that people can use to solve a problem at hand. These "rule of thumb" approaches allow you to simplify complex problems, reducing the total number of possible solutions to a more manageable set.

If you find yourself sitting in a traffic jam, for example, you may quickly consider other routes, taking one to get moving once again. When shopping for a new car, you might think back to a prior experience when negotiating got you a lower price, then employ the same tactics.

While heuristics may be helpful when facing smaller issues, major decisions shouldn't necessarily be made using a shortcut approach. Heuristics also don't guarantee an effective solution, such as when trying to drive around a traffic jam only to find yourself on an equally crowded route.

Trial and Error

A trial-and-error approach to problem-solving involves trying a number of potential solutions to a particular issue, then ruling out those that do not work. If you're not sure whether to buy a shirt in blue or green, for instance, you may try on each before deciding which one to purchase.

This can be a good strategy to use if you have a limited number of solutions available. But if there are many different choices available, narrowing down the possible options using another problem-solving technique can be helpful before attempting trial and error.

In some cases, the solution to a problem can appear as a sudden insight. You are facing an issue in a relationship or your career when, out of nowhere, the solution appears in your mind and you know exactly what to do.

Insight can occur when the problem in front of you is similar to an issue that you've dealt with in the past. Although, you may not recognize what is occurring since the underlying mental processes that lead to insight often happen outside of conscious awareness .

Research indicates that insight is most likely to occur during times when you are alone—such as when going on a walk by yourself, when you're in the shower, or when lying in bed after waking up.

How to Apply Problem-Solving Strategies in Real Life

If you're facing a problem, you can implement one or more of these strategies to find a potential solution. Here's how to use them in real life:

• Create a flow chart . If you have time, you can take advantage of the algorithm approach to problem-solving by sitting down and making a flow chart of each potential solution, its consequences, and what happens next.
• Recall your past experiences . When a problem needs to be solved fairly quickly, heuristics may be a better approach. Think back to when you faced a similar issue, then use your knowledge and experience to choose the best option possible.
• Start trying potential solutions . If your options are limited, start trying them one by one to see which solution is best for achieving your desired goal. If a particular solution doesn't work, move on to the next.
• Take some time alone . Since insight is often achieved when you're alone, carve out time to be by yourself for a while. The answer to your problem may come to you, seemingly out of the blue, if you spend some time away from others.

Obstacles to Problem-Solving

Problem-solving is not a flawless process as there are a number of obstacles that can interfere with our ability to solve a problem quickly and efficiently. These obstacles include:

• Assumptions: When dealing with a problem, people can make assumptions about the constraints and obstacles that prevent certain solutions. Thus, they may not even try some potential options.
• Functional fixedness : This term refers to the tendency to view problems only in their customary manner. Functional fixedness prevents people from fully seeing all of the different options that might be available to find a solution.
• Irrelevant or misleading information: When trying to solve a problem, it's important to distinguish between information that is relevant to the issue and irrelevant data that can lead to faulty solutions. The more complex the problem, the easier it is to focus on misleading or irrelevant information.
• Mental set: A mental set is a tendency to only use solutions that have worked in the past rather than looking for alternative ideas. A mental set can work as a heuristic, making it a useful problem-solving tool. However, mental sets can also lead to inflexibility, making it more difficult to find effective solutions.

How to Improve Your Problem-Solving Skills

In the end, if your goal is to become a better problem-solver, it's helpful to remember that this is a process. Thus, if you want to improve your problem-solving skills, following these steps can help lead you to your solution:

• Recognize that a problem exists . If you are facing a problem, there are generally signs. For instance, if you have a mental illness , you may experience excessive fear or sadness, mood changes, and changes in sleeping or eating habits. Recognizing these signs can help you realize that an issue exists.
• Decide to solve the problem . Make a conscious decision to solve the issue at hand. Commit to yourself that you will go through the steps necessary to find a solution.
• Seek to fully understand the issue . Analyze the problem you face, looking at it from all sides. If your problem is relationship-related, for instance, ask yourself how the other person may be interpreting the issue. You might also consider how your actions might be contributing to the situation.
• Research potential options . Using the problem-solving strategies mentioned, research potential solutions. Make a list of options, then consider each one individually. What are some pros and cons of taking the available routes? What would you need to do to make them happen?
• Take action . Select the best solution possible and take action. Action is one of the steps required for change . So, go through the motions needed to resolve the issue.
• Try another option, if needed . If the solution you chose didn't work, don't give up. Either go through the problem-solving process again or simply try another option.

You can find a way to solve your problems as long as you keep working toward this goal—even if the best solution is simply to let go because no other good solution exists.

Sarathy V. Real world problem-solving .  Front Hum Neurosci . 2018;12:261. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00261

Dunbar K. Problem solving . A Companion to Cognitive Science . 2017. doi:10.1002/9781405164535.ch20

Stewart SL, Celebre A, Hirdes JP, Poss JW. Risk of suicide and self-harm in kids: The development of an algorithm to identify high-risk individuals within the children's mental health system . Child Psychiat Human Develop . 2020;51:913-924. doi:10.1007/s10578-020-00968-9

Rosenbusch H, Soldner F, Evans AM, Zeelenberg M. Supervised machine learning methods in psychology: A practical introduction with annotated R code . Soc Personal Psychol Compass . 2021;15(2):e12579. doi:10.1111/spc3.12579

Mishra S. Decision-making under risk: Integrating perspectives from biology, economics, and psychology . Personal Soc Psychol Rev . 2014;18(3):280-307. doi:10.1177/1088868314530517

Csikszentmihalyi M, Sawyer K. Creative insight: The social dimension of a solitary moment . In: The Systems Model of Creativity . 2015:73-98. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7_7

Chrysikou EG, Motyka K, Nigro C, Yang SI, Thompson-Schill SL. Functional fixedness in creative thinking tasks depends on stimulus modality .  Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts . 2016;10(4):425‐435. doi:10.1037/aca0000050

Huang F, Tang S, Hu Z. Unconditional perseveration of the short-term mental set in chunk decomposition .  Front Psychol . 2018;9:2568. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02568

National Alliance on Mental Illness. Warning signs and symptoms .

Mayer RE. Thinking, problem solving, cognition, 2nd ed .

Schooler JW, Ohlsson S, Brooks K. Thoughts beyond words: When language overshadows insight. J Experiment Psychol: General . 1993;122:166-183. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.2.166

By Kendra Cherry, MSEd Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."

By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.